Comments
Search Comments
Leave username empty to search all users' comments.
iswear12 6/11/2015 9:00:34 AM Rating: 0

Well, like I said its ambiguous and differs from person to person. Usually with low-angle shots done by macro artists, they leave SOME sort of indication that its size content (whether its a speech bubble, hand and foot movement, or some sort of face looking down on you in a way that might show it is size content). Usually low angle POVs from non-macro people don't have those elements (and if they do, it would be less difficult to imagine it as size content than POVs that don't have them)
But it differs from person to person like I said, some people can get off to any low angle shot and use their imagination.
I just feel that the ones that are intended for size content tend to be much better for doing so than the ones not intended.
View Details
chief 6/11/2015 7:36:09 AM Rating: 0

I was an idiot 3 years ago.

It's clearly "More, more!"
View Details
Jimbob 6/11/2015 3:05:11 AM Rating: 2

I don't know how many times it looped while I waited for something more to happen...
View Details
tuxedo_cat 6/11/2015 2:25:29 AM Rating: 0

I think the dark, bloody gore is a nice deviation from MsPaintGTS's normal line-up. Several of his/her works in the past have had a more cruel tone to them; so it's an interesting side to see him/her explore in... redder detail.

This two-part piece did catch me a bit off guard, but in a good way.
View Details
iswear12 6/11/2015 12:17:36 AM Rating: 0

Depends how you define "explicitly intended" for POVs
And if its a struggle to determine whether or not it's size content at all then I'd say it probably doesn't belong on a fetish site (but again, that's just my own personal opinion)
As for value, I never implied it didn't have "value", just that it had SIGNIFICANTLY less value than intended size content (as it should, any schmuck can go and screencap an upskirt POV moment in a vanilla porn movie and call it "size content")
View Details
GIantessbuster209 6/11/2015 12:12:32 AM Rating: 0

Not Bad....im a lady foot fetish person giantess feet at
That but good show more check out my stuff . Lat
View Details
minislave 6/10/2015 11:22:33 PM Rating: 0

Cock crushes for the win ♡♡♡
View Details
Joshua 6/10/2015 11:19:45 PM Rating: 2

Hey guys,
If you don't have anything nice to say, then please don't say anything at all. It is that kind of criticism that makes artists not want to upload their work. June doesn't get paid to share her content with us. Like what you like, and ignore what you don't. Saying things like uh and gross is just rude.
Thank you, rant over.
View Details
ejones312 6/10/2015 7:04:34 PM Rating: 2

From the coloration of the saliva, someone hasn't brushed their teeth.
View Details
paranormalpussy 6/10/2015 6:59:59 PM Rating: 0

Praise dat booty!
View Details
paranormalpussy 6/10/2015 6:53:18 PM Rating: 0

Gross
View Details
paranormalpussy 6/10/2015 6:51:56 PM Rating: 0

More muscular women please!
View Details
Nephilem 6/10/2015 5:10:05 PM Rating: 0

Artist is Chuckwagon
View Details
Nephilem 6/10/2015 5:09:47 PM Rating: 0

Artist is Chuckwagon
View Details
verdi7 6/10/2015 4:55:18 PM Rating: 0

does ace hardware carry that shrink spray?
View Details
WTK55 6/10/2015 4:31:21 PM Rating: 0

Source?
View Details
whatwhat45 6/10/2015 2:50:12 PM Rating: 0

Looks like saying hello was a bad idea
View Details
whatwhat45 6/10/2015 2:37:21 PM Rating: 0

Uh
View Details
Midyin 6/10/2015 8:57:45 AM Rating: 0

OMG YES! Can you please do more Tali stuff? :D
View Details
iswear12 6/10/2015 8:52:16 AM Rating: 0

Talk about semantics
The overwhelming majority of the content on this site is GTS content and the name of the website reflects that (not to mention other gender-neutral size fetish booru names were taken already, but that's besides the point especially considering the ratio of GTS content on those sites were similar to here)
Yes there is some other content RELATED TO SIZE on here, but not much (turn on male content, about 2k images come up, which around 4% of the content of the booru, same thing goes for searching shrunken woman, around 2k images, another 4% of the content)
But seriously, putting in POVs where you have to figure out whether or not its size content is not a good idea on a size fetish site
But that's just my opinion.
View Details
2050100
2,841 pages56,806 records