Comments
Search Comments
Leave username empty to search all users' comments.
Andaris 6/11/2015 10:33:10 AM Rating: 0

Omg i need the source of this pic!!!
View Details
tuxedo_cat 6/11/2015 9:57:37 AM Rating: 0

There actually is a definitive way to measure if a piece fits any of the criteria for this site.

Just cite the source where the work came from. If the artist intended for the work to be a point of view, gts, then there's no questioning it. If the source is just a regular porn website, with no indication of gts content or not, then it wasn't.

Yeah, you can pull the card of "if anyone deems a piece to be gts content, then it's there valid interpretation." But in that case, I could post Da Vinci's Mona Lisa, saying I interpreted her as being 30 feet tall.

All I'm saying is that there are works that are clearly size-related content that can't be posted on this site because the participant(s) aren't at least somewhat humanoid. Meanwhile, works like this that may not have been made with macro/microphilia in mind get a free pass because they're an up-skirt shot.
View Details
Relos 6/11/2015 9:37:25 AM Rating: 0

Lol. Saliva doesn't change color because of bad teeth.
View Details
iswear12 6/11/2015 9:00:34 AM Rating: 0

Well, like I said its ambiguous and differs from person to person. Usually with low-angle shots done by macro artists, they leave SOME sort of indication that its size content (whether its a speech bubble, hand and foot movement, or some sort of face looking down on you in a way that might show it is size content). Usually low angle POVs from non-macro people don't have those elements (and if they do, it would be less difficult to imagine it as size content than POVs that don't have them)
But it differs from person to person like I said, some people can get off to any low angle shot and use their imagination.
I just feel that the ones that are intended for size content tend to be much better for doing so than the ones not intended.
View Details
chief 6/11/2015 7:36:09 AM Rating: 0

I was an idiot 3 years ago.

It's clearly "More, more!"
View Details
Jimbob 6/11/2015 3:05:11 AM Rating: 2

I don't know how many times it looped while I waited for something more to happen...
View Details
tuxedo_cat 6/11/2015 2:25:29 AM Rating: 0

I think the dark, bloody gore is a nice deviation from MsPaintGTS's normal line-up. Several of his/her works in the past have had a more cruel tone to them; so it's an interesting side to see him/her explore in... redder detail.

This two-part piece did catch me a bit off guard, but in a good way.
View Details
iswear12 6/11/2015 12:17:36 AM Rating: 0

Depends how you define "explicitly intended" for POVs
And if its a struggle to determine whether or not it's size content at all then I'd say it probably doesn't belong on a fetish site (but again, that's just my own personal opinion)
As for value, I never implied it didn't have "value", just that it had SIGNIFICANTLY less value than intended size content (as it should, any schmuck can go and screencap an upskirt POV moment in a vanilla porn movie and call it "size content")
View Details
GIantessbuster209 6/11/2015 12:12:32 AM Rating: 0

Not Bad....im a lady foot fetish person giantess feet at
That but good show more check out my stuff . Lat
View Details
minislave 6/10/2015 11:22:33 PM Rating: 0

Cock crushes for the win ♡♡♡
View Details
Joshua 6/10/2015 11:19:45 PM Rating: 2

Hey guys,
If you don't have anything nice to say, then please don't say anything at all. It is that kind of criticism that makes artists not want to upload their work. June doesn't get paid to share her content with us. Like what you like, and ignore what you don't. Saying things like uh and gross is just rude.
Thank you, rant over.
View Details
ejones312 6/10/2015 7:04:34 PM Rating: 2

From the coloration of the saliva, someone hasn't brushed their teeth.
View Details
paranormalpussy 6/10/2015 6:59:59 PM Rating: 0

Praise dat booty!
View Details
paranormalpussy 6/10/2015 6:53:18 PM Rating: 0

Gross
View Details
paranormalpussy 6/10/2015 6:51:56 PM Rating: 0

More muscular women please!
View Details
Nephilem 6/10/2015 5:10:05 PM Rating: 0

Artist is Chuckwagon
View Details
Nephilem 6/10/2015 5:09:47 PM Rating: 0

Artist is Chuckwagon
View Details
verdi7 6/10/2015 4:55:18 PM Rating: 0

does ace hardware carry that shrink spray?
View Details
WTK55 6/10/2015 4:31:21 PM Rating: 0

Source?
View Details
whatwhat45 6/10/2015 2:50:12 PM Rating: 0

Looks like saying hello was a bad idea
View Details
whatwhat45 6/10/2015 2:37:21 PM Rating: 0

Uh
View Details
Midyin 6/10/2015 8:57:45 AM Rating: 0

OMG YES! Can you please do more Tali stuff? :D
View Details
iswear12 6/10/2015 8:52:16 AM Rating: 0

Talk about semantics
The overwhelming majority of the content on this site is GTS content and the name of the website reflects that (not to mention other gender-neutral size fetish booru names were taken already, but that's besides the point especially considering the ratio of GTS content on those sites were similar to here)
Yes there is some other content RELATED TO SIZE on here, but not much (turn on male content, about 2k images come up, which around 4% of the content of the booru, same thing goes for searching shrunken woman, around 2k images, another 4% of the content)
But seriously, putting in POVs where you have to figure out whether or not its size content is not a good idea on a size fetish site
But that's just my opinion.
View Details
gomu_gomu_no_boner 6/10/2015 2:02:08 AM Rating: 0

Darude shitstorm*
View Details
gomu_gomu_no_boner 6/10/2015 2:01:34 AM Rating: 2

Darfur shitstorm
View Details
gameguy 6/10/2015 1:51:17 AM Rating: 0

her name is Ewa Farna
View Details
iHaveSomethingToSay 6/10/2015 1:08:46 AM Rating: 4

lmao, it got thru
View Details
chronotriggeredx1 6/10/2015 12:27:26 AM Rating: 0

Distracting in what way? I'm curious.
View Details
morpheas2 6/10/2015 12:23:36 AM Rating: 0

shouldn't butt_hole be added to the tag?
View Details
morpheas2 6/10/2015 12:20:56 AM Rating: 0

i like to think of this as a tiny is inside her panties being pulled up and this is the last thing he sees before they are pulled all the way up
View Details
iswear12 6/9/2015 11:45:11 PM Rating: 2

I mean this website is called GIANTESSbooru
But whatever
If I wanted vanilla porn POV I can easily find some without this site
View Details
iswear12 6/9/2015 11:42:29 PM Rating: 0

Woops, wasn't clear with my reasoning
My main problem is POVs that don't have faces are difficult to tell whether or not they are GTS content or not
Faces or hand movement can make POVs a lot easier to figure out if it is GTS content or not
View Details
iswear12 6/9/2015 11:30:58 PM Rating: 0

I'm fine with POVs (hell they used to be my favorite part of GTS content)
But this is a stretch
Usually POVs where you can have SOME kind of idea that the girl is a GTS (maybe the girl looking down at you, or you being an area that would be improbable for a reg. size human to be)
But this is a stretch to say the least
View Details
WTK55 6/9/2015 10:44:24 PM Rating: 0

<---
View Details
docwholigan 6/9/2015 10:28:32 PM Rating: 12

Oh boy, this again!
View Details
ThisIsntReal 6/9/2015 9:57:33 PM Rating: 0

...(not spam but my response)
View Details
Alman001 6/9/2015 8:28:01 PM Rating: 0

She certainly does :)
The collage story Goldfish made along with this thing certainly helps enhance this piece. Check it out in the link if you haven't read it already, man :)
View Details
MsPaintGTS 6/9/2015 8:25:11 PM Rating: 6

Pov's are a classic way of demonstrating size in the GTS-Community, You don't ALWAYS have to add a bunch of ant sized tinies, cars, buildings- or any of that biz to have GTS content on your hands.

The hard part is figuring out where to draw the line.

I personally think it's best not to get into drawing that line- I think this is a fine example of pov, it's something many GTS artists do- including myself. :P
View Details
iswear12 6/9/2015 6:41:09 PM Rating: 0

This counts as GTS content?
Hope to god this place doesn't just get flooded with vanilla porn POVs
View Details
GIantessbuster209 6/9/2015 5:58:40 PM Rating: 0

Liv Tyler is crushing through on a hurry. The military
Is tryin to stop this giantess.
View Details
WTK55 6/9/2015 5:09:43 PM Rating: 0

No, it is distracting. Your right.
View Details
openhighhat 6/9/2015 4:53:41 PM Rating: 4

For me micro goes way beyond power.

I used to go out with a girl who I shared my macrophilia with. While she didn't share it she did REALLY get into micro. It wasn't power that she loved but the intimacy. To have a person be able to explore her as if she were a landscape. To walk through her pubic hair like a forest or climb her breasts like mountains. She particularly liked to RP her nipples being climbed.

Good times.
View Details
ThisIsntReal 6/9/2015 4:53:10 PM Rating: 2

Her face is rather distracting....
(Well at least for me that is)
View Details
LadyDeirdre 6/9/2015 4:14:34 PM Rating: 4

Like it or not, this ending is definitely better than seeing Jack and Jill 3.

Also, that last panel is deep.
View Details
LadyDeirdre 6/9/2015 4:11:47 PM Rating: 0

Rule 34 strikes again.
View Details
redrageramen 6/9/2015 3:00:06 PM Rating: 0

Wish I *were* this problem
View Details
Vaux 6/9/2015 12:38:41 PM Rating: 0

Sweet, thanks for the heads up, I will reuplod later today. Thanks for the positive feed back too...
View Details
giantess_lover45 6/9/2015 11:11:48 AM Rating: 0

dude*
View Details
giantess_lover45 6/9/2015 11:11:37 AM Rating: 0

lmao the rude running on the right kills me every time i see him ina collage.
View Details
Vaux 6/9/2015 10:52:53 AM Rating: 0

Ok, thank you. I see some of the new ones, tghanks agian. There are 7 others I uploaded as well. I tried reuploading them but it said they already exist.
View Details
2050100
1,136 pages56,779 records