Comments
Search Comments
Leave username empty to search all users' comments.
Movawn 12/15/2016 9:32:45 PM Rating: 0

I did not know that I will trouble some viewers by posting POV images and gifs, so I apologize for offending those viewers. I really did not mean to offend anyone, therefore I offer a sincere apology for ruining anyone's day, but I tried to upload unique images that will put the viewer in the ideal situation the image or gif is depicting. One of the reasons I upload POV images and gifs is because I personally do not like seeing other shrunken individuals since it inhibits my imagination and I also feel as if the shrunken individual is is taking my highlight away, therefore I upload POV images and gifs for individuals like me. I also upload images of shrunken or giant individuals that I find unique and have not seen on this site. I apologize again for offending anyone, it really was not my intention. I was just trying to share images I found interesting. I apologize Ms. Brooks for causing you trouble.
View Details
Doomflower991 12/15/2016 6:28:12 PM Rating: 0

I agree with Mr. Shark.
View Details
Serik 12/15/2016 3:21:46 PM Rating: 2

The tag filtration system doesn't even work for me. I wouldn't have said that was an issue, because I'm okay with a bit of everything. But, if I didn't want to see certain images, they would still show up.
View Details
MsPaintGTS 12/15/2016 3:10:19 PM Rating: 0

Rather than adding a new filter, wouldn't be easier to just- Make the current tag filter settings a little better?

They currently replace the images with a pony and the words 'filtered'- on it. But that only helps you stop seeing things you don't want to see (unless you don't want to see the pony, in which case it doesn't help at all), where what really needs to happen is that you see more of what you want to see.

I'm honestly not entirely sure why the current tag filtering system works like that, I wouldn't use it myself until it worked like the other filters. -
View Details
Serik 12/15/2016 2:37:11 PM Rating: 0

I was also thinking that a pov filter would work, but I had thought that would be a bit, I'm not sure of a word for it, silly maybe?
View Details
Angelwings 12/15/2016 1:42:49 PM Rating: 2

Thank you for listening to my little point and turning it into a huge discussion.

I believe that these amounts of POV images have less to do with a quality control than with personal tastes.

I completely understand that some people really really like POVs exactly as their favorite type of GTS stuff; for me, it is not even remotely GTS-related as I see it as a pure porn/erotics. While, for example, GTS Furry (which are now filter-protected) are the genuine GTS material, because, you know, there are GTS in it.

So, maybe, a filter? I see no trouble with the current quality filters; most stuff looks good to me, even if uninteresting. This is my favorite GTS site exactly because good quality front page most of the time. But POVs, on other hand, I think, deserve a filter - more than Furry or Medium quality - because the latter are in any case exactly GTS, as in GTS-BOORU, while former is (in my own opinion, which I don't forcefully promote in any way :) ) not exactly GTS because no comparison.
I also used to watch the site in office from time to time, but completely not possible lately :D
View Details
WTK55 12/15/2016 1:12:48 PM Rating: 0

To be fair, exploring a giant vagina does sound like a concept for a Tenacious D song.
View Details
ThisIsntReal 12/15/2016 1:02:52 PM Rating: 0

Jack Black?
View Details
Chuck 12/15/2016 12:37:48 PM Rating: 4

This kind of feedback is amazing and strangely seen... which is a pity, since that makes things better when trying to understand users around here.

Problem specially comes when there is a lot of work around here. I think I have approved a lot of med-quality pictures, mainly digital renders - textures can be quite... disappointing at times -, and until I recently went back to approving collages those were either med or low, because many times there isn't that much effort put in them and the results speak by themselves.

True, we have examples to have a criteria, although in the end many times we let our own perception of quality play a bigger role... but sure, we should be a bit more sticking to the guide we are given.

Anyways, taking notes and trying to see what can be fixed on my end.
View Details
GTSWriter 12/15/2016 5:49:08 AM Rating: 2

Now that's playing against the Giants!
View Details
GIantessbuster209 12/14/2016 11:43:32 PM Rating: 0

Respell Roman with Ronan please thank you my bad.
View Details
Cyberartist26 12/14/2016 10:39:43 PM Rating: 2

Nice POV!!
View Details
MsPaintGTS 12/14/2016 8:58:03 PM Rating: 0

It really is down to every moderator understanding the basic quality rules for the site, there is a handy (albeit probably outdated)- File containing examples that I'm sure not many people have seen on the upload page itself.

I personally think a lot of the work in there has started to resemble in some form or another the work that we are seeing commonly on the site- and even sometimes passing through as high quality.

If the moderation becomes a little tighter, the upload flow will slow a bit and increase in quality, and I think those factors combined will attract more interest and promote higher quality works both being uploaded.
View Details
MsPaintGTS 12/14/2016 7:27:19 PM Rating: 0

- Leaving the subject of the povs behind- I'd like to shift into quality control a bit...

I feel like the reason quality filters exist in the first place is for those who don't mind seeing low-quality content, to receive that content rather than it simply being completely weeded out.

According to the filters we have one low quality image, and ten or so medium quality on the front page - Meaning out of the eighty works on the front page... sixty-nine of those are supposed to be high quality.

It seems like medium quality suddenly represents 'low-quality'- and low quality supposedly represents very very little work.

That isn't to imply things marked medium aren't medium quality, but that the medium tag is much more likely to be used on low quality work- than a low quality tag. And even more likely than that, is no tag at all.

- Some people might find me talking about quality to be hypocritical, but I've grown a lot in my time here. And honestly do not mind my work being tagged medium or low quality as long as the same standards are applied everywhere. That's the main thing I argue for here, universalized standards.

It's a more complicated system and it may be much more of a logistics problem than anything else.. - Just ANOTHER thing to think about while I'm here.
View Details
WTK55 12/14/2016 7:25:57 PM Rating: 0

Ahh Sango, one of my first waifu's lol
View Details
MsPaintGTS 12/14/2016 6:50:38 PM Rating: 0

I think it's far better to seperate your personal enjoyment of the pics- or distaste of the pics from the actual argument of do they support both a quality and diverse front page and the bettering of the website. Which I think it's hard to argue that in-fluxing a large number of them really does.

And as far as 'high amounts of favorites'- Goes... Very few images if any have gotten a lot of favorites in recent weeks at all- And that's especially noticeable in the RL picture pov category. With images barely cracking ten in many cases.

So... I don't really welcome this trend with open arms myself.

Keep in mind, I'm not arguing they should be removed- just that we shouldn't get into the habit of flooding the site with them, it kinda messes with upload cycles a bit for more traditional artists and slightly dampens the impact each piece uploaded on giantessbooru has- Like we could benefit from slowing down and increasing the quality of what comes through, or maybe just using the quality filters a little more. Just- Something to control what's being seen- to keep the front page a mixture of quality content instead of the things you are looking for getting buried and pushed out of view by a mass of one particular type of image.

That's just about all I have to say on this. Just figured I'd post at least one counter-argument while I can...
View Details
Serik 12/14/2016 6:21:39 PM Rating: 2

I prefer actual GT content to most pov stuff. The sudden influx really is covering up most of the other pics. As you said, they're recognized as GT, so as long as they're high enough quality, we approve them. There are actually a decent amount in the queue now and it feels quite repetitive approving each one, as most don't feel different to me. Since I was turned to a mod recently, I had been trying to approve good images quickly, most being pov. So that would explain them covering the front page. It's also easier to pump out pov images rather than drawing them, or even making collages. So that would also help explain it.
View Details
MsPaintGTS 12/14/2016 5:29:42 PM Rating: 8

I'll admit that we've been seeing a lot of these sorts of images and animations recently. - Or at least, it seems like a lot compared to usual, this might be due to images being pulled through the site quicker.. Like- it seems easier to dump images.

The uploader- Movawn has a current status of almost 4 images a day, even though I suspect it's been far higher in recent days.

While- I'm not really a fan, these sorts of images have been argued for in the past- and I tend to agree that pov has a place here, especially when it was the artists intent to make the figure a giantess... But it's also easy to see why it would be frowned upon if the whole front page got flooded with pov images making it difficult to see the giantess pieces that slip in-between these uploads... It has very nearly gotten to that point the last few days... - At least, it seems to me.

Anyone else have thoughts on this?-
View Details
geogg92 12/14/2016 4:57:12 PM Rating: 0

Does anybody know who she is?
View Details
W4RR3N 12/14/2016 4:18:24 PM Rating: 2

Sexy~
View Details
2050100
2,840 pages56,799 records